Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEEMAN BROTHERS, Defendant-Appellee, 1933 — 64 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
Corporations
GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEEMAN BROTHERS, Defendant-Appellee
64 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEEMAN BROTHERS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 344.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 3, 1933.
Melville Church and C. B. Des Jardins, both of Washington, D. C., and Geo. W. Case, of New York City, for appellant.
Newton A. Burgess and Gifford, Scull & Burgess, all of New York City, for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of Coxe, District Judge, below [66 F.(2d) 622] on the issue of noninfringement.