Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re MYRTLE PLUMBING SUPPLIES, Inc., Bankrupt. Petition of Henry A. BLUMENTHAL, 1925 — 10 F.2d 374 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In re MYRTLE PLUMBING SUPPLIES, Inc., Bankrupt. Petition of Henry A. BLUMENTHAL
10 F.2d 374·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re MYRTLE PLUMBING SUPPLIES, Inc., Bankrupt. Petition of Henry A. BLUMENTHAL.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 6, 1925.)
No. 13.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
For opinion below, see 10 F.(2d) 374.
Henry A. Blumenthal, of New York City (David C. Cohen, of New York City, on the brief), for petitioner.
Samuel Silbiger, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for respondent.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to revise dismissed in open court.