Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Order of Railway Conductors of America et al. v. Pitney et al., Trustees, et al., 1945 — 325 U.S. 849 · caselaw · US
General
Order of Railway Conductors of America et al. v. Pitney et al., Trustees, et al.
325 U.S. 849·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 952.
Order of Railway Conductors of America et al. v. Pitney et al., Trustees, et al.
June 18, 1945.
Messrs. V. C. Shuttleworth, Bujus G. Poole and James D. Carpenter, Jr. for petitioners.
Messrs. Harry Lane and Robert Carey for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.