Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna M. Irwin et al., Individually and as Executrices of Jacob V. B. Teller, Deceased, Appellants, v. David Teller et al., Respondents, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 578 · caselaw · US
General
Anna M. Irwin et al., Individually and as Executrices of Jacob V. B. Teller, Deceased, Appellants, v. David Teller et al., Respondents
188 N.Y. 578·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna M. Irwin et al., Individually and as Executrices of Jacob V. B. Teller, Deceased, Appellants, v. David Teller et al., Respondents.
(Submitted March 11, 1907;
decided April 9, 1907.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 188 Nr Y. 25.)
Remittitur so amended as to make the affirmance without prejudice to any application by the appellants for such relief as they may be entitled to as to any mortgage they may have paid on the property.