General
Fredel Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Peter F. Schmitt, Appellant. Gaynor & Rosenblum, Inc., and Others, Respondents, and Harry Goldfein, Defendant
227 A.D. 620·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fredel Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Peter F. Schmitt, Appellant. Gaynor & Rosenblum, Inc., and Others, Respondents, and Harry Goldfein, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
'Judgment and amended judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The findings are against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.