General
The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1030·United States Customs Court·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. P68/192.
protests 63/13693, etc. (New York).
The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Ford, J.]
Ford, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), and that the strainers marked “A” are in chief value of brass and the strainers marked “B” are in chief value of zinc, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.