General

Harry Fish, Appellant, v. Miklos Tischler et al., Respondents

56 A.D.2d 860·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1977·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Harry Fish, Appellant, v Miklos Tischler et al., Respondents. [MAJORITY] In an action to recover a brokerage commission, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 3, 1976, which, inter alia, (1) granted the motion of defendants Sol Nissel and Jacob Schonberger to dismiss the complaint as against them and (2) denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he had a cause of action as against defendants Nissel and Schonberger. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.