Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fred FEIGEL, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1927 — 17 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
General
Fred FEIGEL, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
17 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1927
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fred FEIGEL, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 28, 1927.)
No. 4791.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Rhydon M. Call, Judge.
M. H. Myerson and Ion L. Farris, both of Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff in error.
Francis L. Poor, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Jacksonville, Fla. (Wm. M. Gober, U. S. Atty., of Tampa, Fla., and Louis S. Joel, U. S. Atty., of Jacksonville, Fla., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in this ease is affirmed.