General
Samuel L. Siegler, Respondent, v. Laurence S. Muller and Mitchell S. Lurio, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller & Lurio, Appellants
233 A.D. 756·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel L. Siegler, Respondent, v. Laurence S. Muller and Mitchell S. Lurio, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller & Lurio, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order of the County Court of Kings county striking out affirmative defenses in defendants’ answer and granting judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The answer presents issues of fact to be tried. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.