General

Protests 659698-G, etc., of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc. (Philadelphia)

2 Cust. Ct. 553·United States Customs Court·1939

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 40494. Protests 659698-G, etc., of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc. (Philadelphia). [MAJORITY — Sullivan, J.] Opinion by Sullivan, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 27179, May v. United States (T. D. 47760), and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) the balls and tennis rackets in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 as claimed.

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.