Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George E. Lorenz et al., Petitioners, v. The United States, 1905 — 196 U.S. 640 · caselaw · US
General
George E. Lorenz et al., Petitioners, v. The United States
196 U.S. 640·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 490.
George E. Lorenz et al., Petitioners, v. The United States.
January 30, 1905.
Mr.'Conrad H. Syme, Mr. Samuel- Maddóx and Mr. Charles .A. Douglass for petitioners..
The Attorney General, Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Purdy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.