General
Dalsheim Accessories Corp. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 347·United States Customs Court·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
February 23, 1956
No. 59727.
Dalsheim Accessories Corp. v. United States,
protest 133264-K (New York).
[MAJORITY — Oliver, C. J.]
Opinion by
Oliver, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads represented by items 10023, 10024, and 10025 consist of beads in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained as to said items. Items 11/0 and 18/0, stipulated to consist of beads, loosely strung, were held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph as beads, not specially provided for.