General

THORP v. STEADMAN

224 Ala. 290140 So. 432·Alabama Supreme Court·1932·AL

ANDERSON, O. J., and GARDNER, BOUL-DIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

140 So. 432 THORP v. STEADMAN. 8 Div. 364. Supreme Court of Alabama. March 10, 1932. R. L. Polk, of Sheffield, for appellant. Thos. C. Pettus, of Moulton, for appellee. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. This appeal is prosecuted from what purports to be an order or decree of the probate court and which appears on page 5 of the record. Said decree amounts to nothing more than a holding that a certain plea of the defendant was sustained. There is nothing to indicate a final disposition of the cause, and it is not such a final decree that will support an appeal under section 6078 of the Code of 1923. Nor is it of the character of inter-’ loeutory judgments or decrees as will authorize an appeal therefrom as provided by other provisions of the statute. The appeal is dismissed. ANDERSON, O. J., and GARDNER, BOUL-DIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.