Bankruptcy
In re KUFFLER (two cases)
168 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1909
Before LACOMBB, COXE, and WARD, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re KUFFLER (two cases).
(Circuit Court of Appeals. Second Circuit.
March 16, 1909.)
Nos. 15, 22.
Petition to Review Order of, and Appeal from, the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
For opinion below, see 155 Fed. 1018.
Max J. Kohler and Saul S. Myers, for appellant.
Page, Crawford & Tuska (Benjamin Tuska and Abraham Tulin, of counsel), for respondent.
Before LACOMBB, COXE, and WARD, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The order of the bankruptcy court (Eastern district of New York) now sought to be reviewed is in the precise form which this court approved upon the former appeal. In re Kuffler, 151 Fed. 12, 80 C. C. A. 508. It is “limited to a stay of any application for a discharge from the debts scheduled in the former proceeding.” Wo see no reason to modify our former decision. The debts due to Hinsdale, Smith & Co. and to Joseph Mayer’s Sons were included in the former schedule, and did not become new and different debts because judgment has been entered upon them in the interim. Boynton v. Ball, 121 U. S. 465, 7 Sup. Ct. 981, 30 L. Ed. 985. The order of the District Court is affirmed.