Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret Eagan, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant, 1893 — 140 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
Tax
Margaret Eagan, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant
140 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Eagan, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant.
(Argued November 27, 1893;
decided December 5, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made March 28, 1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion by plaintiff for a retaxation of costs.
Louis Marshall for appellant.
D. G. Feely for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on argument.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.