General
LAFFERTY v. BROWNLEE
11 Cal. 132·Supreme Court of California·1858·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LAFFERTY v. BROWNLEE.
Where the statement on motion for a new trial is not filed within the time prescribed bylaw, this Court will only look to the judgment roll.
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, County of Solano.
Whitman & Wells for Appellant.
John Curry for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court]
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court
Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
In this case the statement on motion for a new trial was not filed within the time prescribed by law, and our investigation must be confined to the judgment roll, which, being regular on its face, the judgment is affirmed.