Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sewell et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1946 — 327 U.S. 783 · caselaw · US
Tax
Sewell et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
327 U.S. 783·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 754.
Sewell et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
February 25, 1946.
E. F. Colladay, Wilton H. Wallace and W. A. Sutherland for petitioners. Solicitor General McGrath, Sewall Key, Arnold Raum, Helen R. Carloss and John F. Costelloe for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.