General
New Jersey et al. v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad Co.
371 U.S. 899·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 104.
New Jersey et al. v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad Co.
Austin L. Roberts, Jr. on the motion.
Vincent P. Biunno for appellee, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 933.) The motion of the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.