Property · MBE-tested
Theodore Sandler, Respondent, v. Anita Subin, Appellant
160 A.D.2d 865·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1990·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theodore Sandler, Respondent, v Anita Subin, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
—In an action, inter alia> to recover an interest in real property, the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), entered August 23, 1988, as directed her to execute a quitclaim deed in favor of the plaintiff conveying to him all of her interest in certain real property, and dismissed her first counterclaim seeking a partition of the property.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice O’Shaughnessy in his memorandum decision at the Supreme Court, dated August 1, 1988. Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.