General
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA et al. v. AMMEX WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., et al.
378 U.S. 12412 L. Ed. 2d 743·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Goldberg dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA et al. v. AMMEX WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., et al.
No. 919.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General, and Felice-R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants.
George D. Byfield for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U. S. 324.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Goldberg dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.