Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Van Dusen, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Barrack, Administratrix, et al., 1963 — 372 U.S. 964 · caselaw · US
General
Van Dusen, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Barrack, Administratrix, et al.
372 U.S. 964·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 738 and 861.
Van Dusen, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Barrack, Administratrix, et al.
Owen B. Rhoads, George J. Miller, J. Welles Henderson, Jr. and Sidney L. Wickenhaver for petitioners in No. 738. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Douglas, J. William Doolittle and Morton Hollander for Van Dusen, petitioner in No. 851. Elwood S. Levy, Abraham E. Freedman, Milton M. Borowsky, John R. McConnell, T. E. Byrne, Jr., Lee S. Kreindler and Abram P. Piwosky for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.