Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grant et al. v. Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., 1956 — 350 U.S. 1015 · caselaw · US
General
Grant et al. v. Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.
350 U.S. 1015·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 697.
Grant et al. v. Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.
Harry Polikoff and Lipman Redman for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles H. Weston, Robert L. Farrington and Neil Brooks for the Secretary of Agriculture, Keith L. Seegmiller and Robert G. Blabey for Carey, and Frederic P. Lee and Edmund F. Cooke for the Adams Producers Cooperative, Inc. et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.