Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sanborn et al. v. Wolfel, 1982 — 458 U.S. 1102 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Sanborn et al. v. Wolfel
458 U.S. 1102·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-1580.
Sanborn et al. v. Wolfel.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U. S. 800 (1982). See Butz v. Economou, 438 U. S. 478, 504 (1978) (deeming it “untenable to draw a distinction for purposes of immunity law between suits brought against state officials under [42 U. S. C.] §1983 and suits brought directly under the Constitution against federal officials”).