Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William S. Keily, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Mechanics and Traders' Bank, Appellant, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 702 · caselaw · US
General
William S. Keily, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Mechanics and Traders' Bank, Appellant
144 N.Y. 702·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William S. Keily, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Mechanics and Traders’ Bank, Appellant.
(Argued January 17, 1895;
decided February 5, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made June 26,1891, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and also from judgment of said General Term entered upon an order made at the June Term, 1893, which affirmed a final judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Charles Strauss for appellant.
Morris J. Hirsch for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgments affirmed.