Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas May, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The People of the State of Illinois for the use of Edward Gobin, etc., 1914 — 232 U.S. 720 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas May, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The People of the State of Illinois for the use of Edward Gobin, etc.
232 U.S. 720·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 262.
Thomas May, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The People of the State of Illinois for the use of Edward Gobin, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.
Argued March 10, 1914.
Decided March 16, 1914.
Mr. Fred B. Merrills for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Charles H. Burton and Mr. James M. Graham for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589; Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450.