Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Honda et al. v. Katzenbach, Attorney General, 1966 — 385 U.S. 917 · caselaw · US
General
Honda et al. v. Katzenbach, Attorney General
385 U.S. 917·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 164.
Honda et al. v. Katzenbach, Attorney General.
Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., and .John Silard for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, David L. Rose and Richard S. Salzman for respondent.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. O’Brien, Chief Deputy Attorney General, and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.