Administrative

Teneyck, Inc., Formerly Known as Neill Supply Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Robert D. Rosenberg, Respondent

111 A.D.3d 529975 N.Y.S.2d 335·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2013·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Teneyck, Inc., Formerly Known as Neill Supply Co., Inc., Appellant, v Robert D. Rosenberg, Respondent. [975 NYS2d 335] [MAJORITY] — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered January 11, 2013, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. This action is barred by the doctrine of in pari delicto (see Kirschner v KPMG LLP, 15 NY3d 446, 464 [2010]). The parties pleaded guilty in federal court to identical charges stemming from the underlying bribery scheme. Contrary to plaintiffs contention, the adverse interest exception does not avail it (see id. at 466-467). Apart from plaintiffs guilty plea, the complaint itself demonstrates that plaintiff profited from the bribery scheme. Plaintiff failed to show that leave to amend the complaint was warranted. Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Richter, ManzanetDaniels and Feinman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 39 Mise 3d 194.]