Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dan ALATORRE et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES Of America, Appellee, 1934 — 69 F.2d 992 · caselaw · US
General
Dan ALATORRE et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES Of America, Appellee
69 F.2d 992·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dan ALATORRE et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES Of America, Appellee.
No. 6970.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 27, 1934.
William H. Scott, of Houston, Tex., for appellants.
H. M. Holden, U. S. Atty., and M. S. McCorquodale and Douglas W. McGregor, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Houston, Tex., for the United States.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and HUTCH-ESON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon confession of error by the United States, it is ordered that the judgment upon the first count be reversed. It is further ordered that the judgment upon the counts other than the first be reversed and annulled.