Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Delbridge v. United States, 1957 — 354 U.S. 906 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Delbridge v. United States
354 U.S. 906·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 579,
Misc.
Delbridge v. United States.
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Isabelle R. Cap-pello for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In the light of the memorandum of the Solicitor General, the order of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and for consideration of such other relief as may be proper and just, after review of the full transcript of the criminal trial. Johnson v. United States, 352 U. S. 565. See also Berger v. United States, 295 U. S. 78, 88-89.