Administrative

Dino DiCienzo et al., Respondents, v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent. The Niagara Venture, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

56 A.D.2d 1149866 N.Y.S.2d 912·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2008·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Dino DiCienzo et al., Respondents, v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent. The Niagara Venture, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.) [866 NYS2d 912] [MAJORITY] — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered September 17, 2007. The order denied the motion of The Niagara Venture to intervene. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Niagara Venture v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency (56 AD3d 1150 [2008]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Lunn, Fahey and Pine, JJ.