General

MARIE C. RICE et al., by Her Guardian, etc., Respondents, v. B. W. HARDY, Appellant

134 Cal. App. 397·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1933·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Civ. No. 544. Fourth Appellate District. September 28, 1933.] MARIE C. RICE et al., by Her Guardian, etc., Respondents, v. B. W. HARDY, Appellant. Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy and L. W. Blodgett for Appellant. McFadden & Holden for Respondents. [MAJORITY — JENNINGS, J.] JENNINGS, J. The clerk’s transcript in this ease was filed on October 25, 1930. No brief has been filed by either party to the action. This court, therefore, on its own motion, noticed an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, for September 12, 1933. No cause has been shown why the appeal should not be dismissed and no appearance has been made. The appeal is dismissed. Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.