Contracts · MBE-tested
ROSENBERG et al. v. UNITED STATES
346 U.S. 32497 L. Ed. 2d 1634·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROSENBERG et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No.-, June 18 Special Term, 1953.
Decided June 19, 1953.
Fyke Farmer submitted the motion.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Frankfurter]
Per Curiam.
The motion for reconsideration of the question of the Court’s power to vacate Mr. Justice Douglas’ stay order and hear oral argument is denied.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter
desires that it be noted that he too would deny the motion to reconsider the power of this Court to review Mr. Justice Douglas’ order to stay the execution, but not because he thinks the matter is free from doubt. See his dissenting opinion in Ex parte Peru, 318 U. S. 578, 590, in connection with Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U. S. 697, and Carper v. Fitzgerald, 121 U. S. 87.