Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph Gordon, Appellant, v. Bernard J. Maas, Respondent, 1907 — 190 N.Y. 539 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph Gordon, Appellant, v. Bernard J. Maas, Respondent
190 N.Y. 539·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Gordon, Appellant, v. Bernard J. Maas, Respondent.
Gordon v. Maas, 115 App. Div. 377, affirmed:
(Submitted November 25, 1907;
decided December 10, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment entered December 8, 1906, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action to set aside an assignment.
William P. Maloney for appellant.
Walter J. Posenstein for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Geay, O’Bbien, Yann, Wegner, Willabd Babtlett and Chase, JJ.