General
NEWTOWN CREEK TOWING COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. Steamer SANTA ROSALIA, her engines; United States Steel Products Company, Claimant-Appellee; United States Steel Products Company, Cross-Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug CONVOY; Newtown Creek Towing Company, Claimant-Appellant
293 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1923
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEWTOWN CREEK TOWING COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. Steamer SANTA ROSALIA, her engines; United States Steel Products Company, Claimant-Appellee. United States Steel Products Company, Cross-Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug CONVOY; Newtown Creek Towing Company, Claimant-Appellant.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circiiit.
November 5, 1923.)
No. 52.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Alexander & Ash, of New York City (Mark Ash and Edward Ash, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant. Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hiekox & Keating, of New York City (W. H. McGrann and J. H. Turnare, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.