General
Samuel Korngut, Respondent, v. Nassau Newspaper Delivery Express Company, Appellant
155 A.D. 886·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1913·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel Korngut, Respondent, v. Nassau Newspaper Delivery Express Company, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 30th day of April, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury and from an order entered on the same day denying a motion for a new trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed ’and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence to establish the vicious tendency of the horse; and also for error in admitting evidence óf a statement of an unidentified person not shown to have had any knowledge on the subject. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott, and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.