Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Cameron, Appellant, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 557 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Cameron, Appellant
180 N.Y. 557·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Cameron, Appellant.
People v. Cameron, 89 App. Div. 141, affirmed.
(Argued January 30, 1905;
decided February 21, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 1, 1903, which affirmed a judgment of the Erie County Court rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of robbery in the first degree, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Hamilton Ward, Jr.-,,for appellant.
John W. Ryan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction and order denying motion for a new trial affirmed ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.