Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph MATCHOK, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee, 1933 — 67 F.2d 1004 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph MATCHOK, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee
67 F.2d 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph MATCHOK, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.
No. 7139.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 21, 1933.
Joseph Matchok, in pro. per.
H. T. Nichols, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of Albrecht v. United States, 273 U. S. 1, 47 S. Ct. 250, 71 L. Ed. 505, and of United States v. Daugherty, 269 U. S. 360, 46 S. Ct. 156, 70 L. Ed. 309, the judgment is affirmed.