General
Richard K. Fox, Appellant, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Respondents
168 N.Y. 652·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard K. Fox, Appellant, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Respondents.
Eox v. N. T. Elevated B. B. Oo., 42 App. Div. 613, affirmed.
(Argued October 11, 1901;
decided November 1, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Ajipellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 23,1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Charles H. Strong for appellant.
Arthur O. Townsend, Charles A,. Ga/rdmer, Ezra A. Tuttle and J. Osgood Nichols for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker," Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ,