General
Charles Reich, Respondent, v. Sidney Ward, Defendant, and Elmer O'Donnell, Appellant; Samuel Reich, Respondent, v. Sidney Ward, Defendant, and Elmer O'Donnell, Appellant
240 A.D. 999·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Reich, Respondent, v. Sidney Ward, Defendant, and Elmer O’Donnell, Appellant. Samuel Reich, Respondent, v. Sidney Ward, Defendant, and Elmer O’Donnell, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.