Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George B. Scoville, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Bronson A. Shed et al., Respondents, 1890 — 120 N.Y. 646 · caselaw · US
General
George B. Scoville, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Bronson A. Shed et al., Respondents
120 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George B. Scoville, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Bronson A. Shed et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 17, 1890;
decided June 3, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Oourt in the fourth judicial department, entered imon an order made November 9, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial a^ Special Term.
Wayland F. Ford for appellant.
E. C. Emerson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm • no opinion.
All concur except Follett. Olí. J.. not sitting, and Vann, J.,. not voting.
Judgment affirmed.