Torts · MBE-tested
Michael Coleman, Respondent, v. Interurban Street Railway Company, Appellant
187 N.Y. 520·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Coleman, Respondent, v. Interurban Street Railway Company, Appellant.
Coleman v. Interurban Street Ry. Co., 111 App. Div. 915, affirmed.
(Argued December 14, 1906;
decided January 8, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 5,1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.
E. D. O'Brien, Bayard H. Ames, Walter H. Wood and Henry A. Robinson for appellant.
John C. Robinson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: O’Brien, J.