Contracts · MBE-tested
Frank G. Hanssel, Doing Business as the Frank G. Hanssel Company, Respondent, Appellant, v. P. Tomasetti Contracting Corporation, Appellant, Respondent, and Buffalo Sewer Authority, Respondent
257 A.D. 1099·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank G. Hanssel, Doing Business as the Frank G. Hanssel Company, Respondent, Appellant, v. P. Tomasetti Contracting Corporation, Appellant, Respondent, and Buffalo Sewer Authority, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.