Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Franklin Huff et al., Petitioners, v. The United States, 1916 — 241 U.S. 667 · caselaw · US
General
Franklin Huff et al., Petitioners, v. The United States
241 U.S. 667·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 917.
Franklin Huff et al., Petitioners, v. The United States.
April 10, 1916.
Mr. C. L. Bartlett, Mr. Marion Smith, Mr. John D. Little, Mr. Arthur G. Powell and Mr. M. F. Goldstein for the petitioners. The Attorney General, The Solicitor General, and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Wallace for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.