Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Virginia v. Maryland, 1963 — 371 U.S. 943 · caselaw · US
General
Virginia v. Maryland
371 U.S. 943·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 7, 1963.
No. 10, Original.
Virginia v. Maryland.
[MAJORITY]
The report of the Special Master is received, approved and ordered filed. In view of the suggestion of the parties and the recommendation of the Special Master that the case has been settled and is now moot, the bill of complaint is dismissed. The costs in this case are to be equally divided between the parties. The Special Master, having completed all of his duties, is hereby discharged. [For previous decision and order of the Court, see 355 U. S. 269,946.]