Corporations
OLMSTED-STEVENSON CO. v. LANGDORF. In re LANGDORF
231 F. 76·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OLMSTED-STEVENSON CO. v. LANGDORF. In re LANGDORF.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 6, 1916.)
No. 2627.
Petition for Revision of a Certain Order of the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana, in Bankruptcy; George M. B our quin. Judge.
In the matter of S. A. Langdorf, bankrupt. On petition by the Olmsted-Stevenson Company for revision, under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, e. 541, § 24b, 30 Stat. 553 (Comp. St. 1913, § 9608), of an order in matter of law.
Affirmed.
John B. Clayberg, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
L. P. Forestell, of San Francisco, Cal., and Rodgers & Rodgers, of Anaconda, Mont., for respondent.
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.
Rehearing denied May 8,1916.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, in accordance with the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, filed August 23, 1915, providing that the above-entitled matter shall abide the decision of this court as rendered in the matter of Olmsted-Stevenson Co., a Corporation, Petitioner, v. R. S. Miller, Bankrupt, Respondent, in the Matter of R. S. Miller, a Bankrupt (No. 2628) 231 Fed. 69, — C. C. A. -, and in accordance with the decision this day rendered by this court in the latter matter.