Contracts · MBE-tested
HALL v. NASHVILLE, C. & ST. L. RY.
230 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1916
Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HALL v. NASHVILLE, C. & ST. L. RY.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 27, 1916.)
No. 2849.
In Error to the District Court of the
United States for the Northern District of Alabama; William I. Grubb, Judge.
S. S. Pleasants and R. E. Smith, both of Huntsville, Ala., and James D. Richardson, Jr., of Murfreesboro, Tenn., for plaintiff in error. Paul Speake, •of Huntsville, Ala., and W. B. Lamb, of Fayetteville, Tenn., for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On full consideration of the record and arguments, we find
no reversible error in the proceedings in this case. The judgment is affirmed.