Administrative

Sandra Peralli v. Woodrow Pitkat

19 Conn. App. 803·Connecticut Appellate Court·1989·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Sandra Peralli v. Woodrow Pitkat (7395) Daly, Foti and Jacobson, Js. Argued May 16 — decision released June 21, 1989 I. David Marder, with whom, on the brief, was Irene Cornish, for the appellant (plaintiff). Glenn E. Coe, with whom, on the brief, was Margaret E. Moriarty, for the appellee (defendant). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order imposing sanctions against her and requiring her to make weekly payments for child support and the sanctions. The plaintiff’s essential claim is that the court’s determination of her earning capacity was unsupported by the evidence. Our examination of the record indicates that there was ample evidence for the trial court to determine the plaintiff’s earning capacity. We will not retry the facts. Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc., 15 Conn. App. 804, 543 A.2d 287 (1988). There is no error.