General
Maya Zak, Respondent-Appellant, v. One East 100th Street Physicians, P. C., Appellant-Respondent
111 A.D.2d 97·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1985·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maya Zak, Respondent-Appellant, v One East 100th Street Physicians, P. C., Appellant-Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Groh, J.), entered on May 4, 1984, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The cross appeal from the judgment is dismissed as not properly taken in view of the stipulation dated December 16, 1983, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion.
Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Carro, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.