Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frances L. Haight, Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of Saratoga County, Appellant, 1887 — 107 N.Y. 677 · caselaw · US
General
Frances L. Haight, Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of Saratoga County, Appellant
107 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frances L. Haight, Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of Saratoga County, Appellant.
(Argued December 2, 1887;
decided December 20, 1887.)
0. iS. Lester for appellant.
L. B. Pike for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm with modification reducing interest to six per cent from January 1, 1880 ; no opinion. '
All concur, except Beckham, J., not sitting.
Ordered accordingly.