Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bay Ridge Operating Co., Inc. v. Aaron et al.; Huron Stevedoring Corp. v. Blue et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 838 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Bay Ridge Operating Co., Inc. v. Aaron et al.; Huron Stevedoring Corp. v. Blue et al.
335 U.S. 838·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton are of opinion the petition for rehearing should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 366,
No. 367,
October Term, 1947.
October Term, 1947.
Bay Ridge Operating Co., Inc. v. Aaron et al., Huron Stevedoring Corp. v. Blue et al.,
[MAJORITY]
334 U. S. 446; and
334 U. S. 446. Rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton are of opinion the petition for rehearing should be granted.